Uncover a sooner, less complicated path to publishing in a high-quality journal. PLOS ONE guarantees honest, rigorous peer evaluate,
broad scope, and broad readership – an ideal match on your analysis each time.
Click on via the PLOS taxonomy to search out articles in your subject.
For extra details about PLOS Topic Areas, click on
right here.
Affiliations
In vivo Mobile and Molecular Imaging (ICMI) laboratory, School of Drugs and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium,
Centrum voor Hart- en Vaatziekten (CHVZ), Division of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussel, Belgium
Affiliations
In vivo Mobile and Molecular Imaging (ICMI) laboratory, School of Drugs and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium,
Centrum voor Hart- en Vaatziekten (CHVZ), Division of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussel, Belgium
Affiliations
In vivo Mobile and Molecular Imaging (ICMI) laboratory, School of Drugs and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium,
Centrum voor Hart- en Vaatziekten (CHVZ), Division of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussel, Belgium
Affiliation
In vivo Mobile and Molecular Imaging (ICMI) laboratory, School of Drugs and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
Affiliation
In vivo Mobile and Molecular Imaging (ICMI) laboratory, School of Drugs and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
Affiliations
In vivo Mobile and Molecular Imaging (ICMI) laboratory, School of Drugs and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium,
Centrum voor Hart- en Vaatziekten (CHVZ), Division of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussel, Belgium
Affiliations
In vivo Mobile and Molecular Imaging (ICMI) laboratory, School of Drugs and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium,
Centrum voor Hart- en Vaatziekten (CHVZ), Division of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussel, Belgium
Figures
Summary
Introduction
Calcific aortic valve stenosis (AVS) is probably the most frequent valvular coronary heart illness and main trigger for valvular surgical procedure in Western international locations.[1] On this setting the quantity of calcification has necessary medical implications. It’s a highly effective predictor of morbidity and mortality in calcific aortic valve illness (CAVD)[2,3] and permits a extra correct evaluation of the illness severity in low-flow low-gradient AVS[4]. In therapeutic choice making, calcification burden and localization are additionally necessary throughout pre-operative analysis for aortic valve (AV) alternative or bicuspid leaflet restore.[5] In sufferers, handled with trans-catheter aortic valve implantation, the quantity and localization of calcium is related to an elevated danger for paravalvular regurgitation.[6] As CAVD develops, the presence of calcification has an necessary prognostic worth and is related to sooner development of AVS.[3,7] Not too long ago, calcification has been urged as a goal for brand spanking new remedy in sufferers[8], and in experimental settings serial examinations allowed to guage the impact of remedy on CAVD[9]. Due to this fact, imaging modalities are necessary, not just for prognostic evaluation but additionally for serial follow-up with monitoring of development and potential regression of CAVD.
Computed tomography (CT), at the moment the reference approach for quantification of AV calcifications, is much less appropriate for repetitive evaluations, because of irradiation.[2] Due to this fact, new strategies for exact quantification of calcifications are wanted, that let serial follow-up of CAVD sufferers.
Echocardiography is primarily used to guage AV morphology and performance, however earlier research demonstrated that ultrasound (US) will also be used to evaluate the severity of cardiac calcifications.[10–12] Nevertheless these semi-quantitative scoring methods have been solely obtained visually and the precise quantity of calcium couldn’t be decided. Different US strategies, corresponding to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), are already utilized in atherosclerosis to characterize plaque calcification, however can’t be utilized to shifting constructions such because the AV.[13] Lastly, built-in backscatter (IB), the built-in common vitality of US backscattered reflections, could possibly be used to extract info regarding valvular tissue composition and to detect AV calcifications in rats.[14] IB was not too long ago validated for the detection of development and regression of AV calcifications in vivo, in addition to for the differentiation between AV thickening and AV calcifications in rats.[14,15] Nevertheless, up to now neither ultrasound approach, utilizing gray-scale or IB evaluation, has been validated to quantify the exact quantity of calcium, which at the moment can solely be measured with CT.[2]
Within the current research we aimed and achieved to validate a brand new US technique for quantifying the quantity of calcium in an in vitro mannequin and to match the outcomes obtained with CT.
Supplies and Strategies
Outcomes – “calcium quantification”
Dialogue
Utilizing US, we developed a brand new semi-automatic technique to precisely quantify the quantity of calcium in an in vitro mannequin. We have been in a position to calculate US scores that correlate with the assorted quantities of calcium current in a phantom. Moreover, the US calcium rating was in contrast with the CT calcium rating, exhibiting a robust correlation between the 2 imaging modalities.
Phantoms are an necessary device for the analysis and validation of imaging modalities. Agar, with its acoustic velocity, density and impedance much like human tissue, has beforehand been used as phantom materials for US and CT.[18,19] In earlier research, agar phantoms have been made to imitate cardiac tissue.[20] We subsequently developed an agar-based phantom, appropriate with each imaging modalities, and simple to imbed calcium in. This in vitro phantom-based mannequin allowed us to insert precise quantities of calcium, so as to validate US as a quantification approach and to match it with CT.
CAVD is an lively illness course of involving endothelial injury, irritation and calcification with hydroxyapatite deposition.[21–23] To imitate these calcifications extra intently, we developed a phantom containing hydroxyapatite. Hydroxyapatite is a secure calcium salt, current in closely calcified valves and in valves with minor calcifications.[24–26] A number of different types of calcium may be detected in calcified cardiovascular tissue, corresponding to octacalciumphosphate, beta tricalciumphosphate and dicalciumphosphate, and amorphous calcium phosphate, which is usually recommended to play a task as precursor for hydroxyapatite.[27–30] Nevertheless, the precise composition of calcific deposits shouldn’t be recognized and should change through the calcification course of. It’s subsequently theoretically unattainable to develop a phantom, an identical to the in vivo scenario. We used hydroxyapatite, the ultimate and secure calcium salt, that particularly may be detected and which contribution in calcific deposits is subsequently extra clearly established.[22,29] Furthermore, hydroxyapatite is detected by CT through the analysis of valvular calcifications, which makes it the best calcium salt for use for the comparability of US and CT calcium quantification.[4,6,31] However, when the US calcium rating is evaluated in a medical setting, the potential affect of different calcium salts ought to be taken into consideration. As to this in vitro research, we’re assured that, though our mannequin doesn’t replicate the complexity of the medical scenario, it’s a first and necessary step within the software of US for the quantification of aortic valve calcifications.
Supporting Data