Probiotics For Plants

References – Probiotics For Plants

Plant biostimulants are utilized to enhance crop manufacturing and dietary high quality of agrifood merchandise. They’re usually included in agricultural administration practices geared toward decreasing chemical inputs, rising productiveness and recovering the pure equilibrium in agro-ecosystems.

The extensively accepted definition of plant biostimulants (see EBIC, 2013; du Jardin, 2015) is: substance(s) and/or micro-organisms whose operate when utilized to crops or the soil rhizosphere stimulates the pure processes to reinforce/profit nutrient uptake and effectivity, tolerance to abiotic stress, and crop high quality. Usually, biostimulants wouldn’t have a direct motion in opposition to pests.

Industrial formulations might comprise a mixture of: humic and fulvic acids, amino acids, seaweeds or plant extracts, pure poly- and oligo-mers, chemical components (Al, Co, Na, Se, and Si), useful fungi or micro organism (du Jardin, 2015; Yakhin et al., 2017). Not all listed parts are “biological,” which makes the time period “bio”-stimulant considerably ambiguous. The “bio” designation could also be attributed to the residing organism parts, and their pure substances. As a substitute, the non-organic components may be thought of as optimistic effectors of the “biological” processes that regulate the plant physiology, metabolism, morphology and interactions throughout the agroecosystem.

Regulatory Laws—Plant Safety Merchandise vs. Plant Fertilizers

The registration of agricultural merchandise in Europe follows two distinct laws pathways: Plant Safety Merchandise (PPPs) or Fertilizers. PPPs, together with microbes and chemical compounds, as outlined in Regulation (EC) , defend crops or plant merchandise in opposition to dangerous organisms, affect the life strategy of crops (i.e., have an effect on plant progress, however usually are not vitamins), protect plant merchandise, destroy undesired crops or their elements. The PPP registration course of is cumbersome and infrequently not appropriate for plant biostimulants (du Jardin, 2015), for which firms search permission for his or her use as Fertilizers (see Regulation (EC) , that may additionally cut back time and bills required for product registration.

Up to now, regulatory processes designed for plant biostimulants haven’t been established. Official definitions and the essential rules for brand new laws are nonetheless being mentioned each within the EU and the united statesA (du Jardin, 2015). To this finish, it is very important think about the inclusion within the registration pipeline of Plant Progress Selling Microbes (PGPM): microbial people and consortia, their bioactive compounds, and potential multi-component mixtures—as they’re necessary parts of many profitable plant biostimulant merchandise.

Quite a few microorganisms, comparable to Trichoderma spp., are registered as PPPs and categorized as Microbial Organic Management Brokers (MBCA; Woo et al., 2014). Though single strains are enlisted as biopesticides, many are additionally identified to have properties that lead to plant progress promotion and different useful results (Lorito and Woo, 2015), usually not indicated within the registered product disclaimer. Conversely, there are plant biostimulants comparable to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF; Rouphael et al., 2015), which can be additionally able to inducing systemic resistance conferring crop safety to illness and pest assault (Cameron et al., 2013). Which means that there may be an pressing have to create a brand new registration observe for microbes or microbial consortia with a number of plant useful features (e.g., MBCA and PGPM) as a way to regulate using efficient agricultural merchandise which can be “all inclusive” (e.g., biostimulant, biofertilizer, biopesticide).

Plant Progress Selling Microbes (PGPM) in Useful Microbial Consortia

Vital examples of optimistic plant-microbe interactions related to plant progress promotion embrace PGP rhizobacteria: non-pathogenic Pseudomonas and Bacillus, Azotobacter, Serratia, Azospirillum able to bettering nutrient availability in soil, plant nutrient uptake and assimilation, in addition to supporting nitrogen biking (Raaijmakers et al., 2009; Berg et al., 2014; Lugtenberg, 2015).

PGPM of fungal origins are extensively utilized, however much less acknowledged within the literature. The perfect documented instance is that of the mycorrhizal fungi (AMF, VAM) together with Gigaspora, Funneliformis or Rhizophagus (Glomus), and Laccaria, which can be root obligate biotrophs capable of set up mutualistic symbiosis with >80% of vascular plant species (Pringle et al., 2009; Rouphael et al., 2015). They’re concerned in carbon alternate, and increase the capability of the plant to soak up water plus vitamins, thus counteracting unfavourable results of biotic and abiotic stresses. One other case is the fungus Trichoderma. It’s an lively ingredient in lots of of agricultural merchandise commercialized worldwide (Woo et al., 2014), it has a number of useful results on crops (Harman et al., 2004), and used extensively in organic and built-in pest administration (Lorito and Woo, 2015).

Many latest research exhibit the potential as plant biostimulants of microbial consortia, rhizobacteria, and rhizofungi, that operate as an agricultural probiotics (de Vries and Wallenstein, 2017; Wallenstein, 2017; Kong et al., 2018). The current work describes an instance of two potential microbes and their qualities as consortium parts.

Trichoderma: the Evolving MBCA With A number of Plant Useful Results

Quite a few strains of Trichoderma are profitable MBCA of varied plant pathogens. Initially, the biopesticidal exercise was thought of as the one profit, however finally these MBCA have been demonstrated to be efficient biofertilizers, biostimulants, bio-enhancers of crop resistance to each biotic and abiotic stresses (Harman et al., 2004; Fontenelle et al., 2011; Lorito and Woo, 2015). In reality, scientific proof demonstrated that the PGP impact may very well be the results of a real symbiotic interplay (Harman et al., 2004; Vinale et al., 2008; Shoresh et al., 2010; Studholme et al., 2013; Lorito and Woo, 2015).

In sure situations, Trichoderma might activate a state of alert within the plant (i.e., priming), thus producing a prepared response to pathogen assault, which finally anticipates the institution of a Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR) and/or Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR; Rubio et al., 2014; Hossain et al., 2017; Martínez-Medina et al., 2017; Manganiello et al., 2018). Moreover, outcomes from laboratory and area checks with Trichoderma, carried out on a wide range of crops, have proven a discount in signs brought on by abiotic illnesses (e.g., water, salt, vitamins) following therapies (Mastouri et al., 2012; Brotman et al., 2013; Sofo et al., 2014; Fiorentino et al., 2018).

Enchancment in plant improvement is often famous with elevated seed germination, above- and below-ground plant elements, chlorophyll content material and yield, dimension and/or variety of flowers and/or fruits (Harman et al., 2004; Hermosa et al., 2012; Studholme et al., 2013; Mendoza-Mendoza et al., 2018). Particularly, modifications to the roots will increase the realm of absorption, bettering nutrient uptake and translocation, then the environment friendly use of NPK and micronutrients attributes to enhanced plant biomass (Samolski et al., 2012). The PGP impact is attributed to the position of Trichoderma within the solubilization of phosphate and micronutrients (Altomare et al., 1999), mediated by the discharge of siderophores and secondary metabolites (Vinale et al., 2009, 2013, 2014; Spaepen, 2015), or modifications in ethylene and auxin (Hermosa et al., 2013; Contreras-Cornejo et al., 2015) that stimulate plant improvement.

Trichoderma spp. produce over 250 metabolic merchandise together with cell wall degrading enzymes, peptides, secondary metabolites and different proteins (Sivasithamparam and Ghisalberti, 1998; Harman et al., 2004; Morán-Diez et al., 2009; Lorito et al., 2010; Keswani et al., 2014; Ruocco et al., 2015). Many of those compounds are bioactive and might have an effect on the plant response to different microbes, by bettering protection mechanisms, whereas stimulating plant progress and improvement, particularly on the root degree (Sivasthamparam and Ghisalberti, 1998; Vinale et al., 2009, 2013; Lombardi et al., 2018). Synergistic results on biocontrol have been discovered in lots of mixtures of numerous strains, metabolites, mixtures of bioactive compounds, originating from Trichoderma in addition to different microbes or crops, which suggests a wealth of potentialities for creating a brand new technology of biostimulants.

Azotobacter: Rhizocompetent Stress Tolerant N 2 Free-Residing Micro organism

Azotobacter consists of free-living species that straight affect vitamin in agroecosystems via nitrogen fixation, thus rising the soil degree of this very important component for crops. The bacterium has the power to type warmth and desiccation-resistant cysts, offering inoculant with a protracted shelf-life (Inamdar et al., 2000) and tolerance to drought and salinity stress (Vacheron et al., 2013; Berg et al., 2014; Viscardi et al., 2016). In its resistant type, Azotobacter can stand up to biotic and abiotic stresses whereas positively interacting with different microrganisms and crops in agroecosystems (Babalola, 2010; Ahmad et al., 2011; Berendsen et al., 2012; Bhattacharyya and Jha, 2012; Gaiero et al., 2013; Philippot et al., 2013). Quite a few business biofertilizer merchandise comprise Azotobacter as lively substances, usually in affiliation with fungi, actinomycetes in addition to different micro organism (e.g., bacilli; EBIC, 2013).

The power of useful Azotobacter strains to secrete plant progress selling and regulating substances comparable to phytohormones, nutritional vitamins, and antifungal metabolites have been studied. Phosphate solubilization (Hariprasad and Niranjana, 2009; Rojas-Tapias et al., 2012; Wani et al., 2013) and Fe mobilization (Rizvi and Khan, 2018) have been demonstrated in vitro and in soil, additionally underneath abiotic stress situations (Viscardi et al., 2016; Van Oosten et al., 2018).

Moreover, the Azotobacter-mediated synthesis of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), proline, and excessive ranges of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) exercise (Glick, 2014) can affect plant well being and convey advantages to all kinds of crops comparable to tomato (Viscardi et al., 2016), maize (Rojas-Tapias et al., 2012), rice, wheat, and sorghum (Inamdar et al., 2000; Di Stasio et al., 2017; Van Oosten et al., 2018). Barra et al. (2016) confirmed the significance of ACC deaminase (ACCd) exercise and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) manufacturing for the alleviation of salt stress in crops handled with rhizo-competent stress tolerant Azotobacter strains. Equally, a mannequin proposed by Hermosa et al. (2012) indicated that the ACCd and IAAs produced by Trichoderma additionally regulated the equilibrium between plant progress and protection.

Agricultural Probiotics: Microbial Consortia to Improve PGP Efficacy

Just lately, a brand new strategy to “rhizosphere engineering” proposes the addition of efficient microbial inoculants to emulate the structured organic networks in native soils, thus stimulating the restoration of purposeful, useful microbial teams positively linked to soil fertility (Ruzzi and Aroca, 2015; Shi et al., 2016; Wallenstein, 2017; Stringlis et al., 2018), and replenishing the pure microbiome lowered by crop domestication (Leff et al., 2016; Perez-Jaramillo et al., 2016). These therapies might activate nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, siderophore, phytohormone, and exopolysaccharide manufacturing identified to reinforce progress whereas defending the plant from abiotic stresses, e.g., excessive temperature, pH, salinity, drought (Ashraf et al., 2004; Compant et al., 2005; Gopalakrishnan et al., 2015; Viscardi et al., 2016; Van Oosten et al., 2017), plus heavy metallic, and pesticide air pollution (Ventorino et al., 2014). Although information is restricted on the survival of the microbial inoculants, the power of rhizosphere competent micro organism and fungi to ascertain shut associations with the native microbiota and soil fauna has been sufficiently demonstrated (Hardoim et al., 2015; Bonanomi et al., 2017, 2018; de Vries and Wallenstein, 2017). The artificial bacteria-fungi consortia have the potential to ascertain novel microbial communities (Ahmad et al., 2011; Berg et al., 2014; du Jardin, 2015; Lugtenberg, 2015), whereas co-applications of various microbes might activate new PGP results not obtained through the use of single species (Wargo and Hogan, 2006).

Plant microbiome engineering requires the identification and culturing of potential PGPMs, deep evaluation/choice of the assorted parts, analysis of the compatibility between microorganisms, willpower of the trigger and results within the native agroecosystem, improvement of enough formulation recipes and distribution know-how, plus provision of technical assist to end-users (Berendsen et al., 2012; Berg et al., 2014; Lugtenberg, 2015; Yakhin et al., 2017; Kong et al., 2018). To this finish, the in depth research on Trichoderma and Azotobacter counsel that these fungi and micro organism may very well be functionally complementary in a PGP consortium, though the results on the resident rhizosphere microbiota haven’t been sufficiently elucidated. Moreover, the Trichoderma-Azotobacter consortia may very well be built-in with botanical and inorganic compounds, seaweeds, polymers, animal-derived merchandise to develop really efficient, and dependable useful plant merchandise. ‘Omics research can reveal primary mechanisms regulating these advanced interactions and supply new information targeting the mechanisms that may very well be related for bettering the following technology of plant biostimulants (Bell et al., 2015; Soni et al., 2017; Fiorentino et al., 2018; Ventorino et al., 2018).

The worldwide biopesticide market is repeatedly rising attributable to altering agricultural legislations and rules, elevated demand for organic/natural merchandise, conversions from standard to built-in pest administration (IPM), and natural farming techniques (Woo et al., 2014; Lugtenberg, 2015). Equally, a gentle progress is noticed within the biofertilizer market (about 10% per 12 months; EBIC, 2013). The brand new frontier for plant biostimulants ought to revenue from the useful associations of microorganisms and compounds, by constructing on a deeper understanding of plant-microbe interactions developed by Nature. New microbial consortium may be designed, e.g., Trichoderma plus Azotobacter, as agricultural probiotics appropriate for sustaining the agroecosystem whereas bettering the amount and high quality of yield.

Creator Contributions

SW and OP conceived the ideas and wrote the manuscript in collaboration.

Funding

JGI Neighborhood Scientific Program 2016, Proposal 1966-CSP 2016; Venture ProBio – IZSM (Portici), n. D01 6309, 14/12/2016; Venture SIX – B.U. Regione Puglia, n. 111, 29/9/2016, Cod. C; Venture LINFA – MIUR-PON, n. 03PE_00026_1, 09/04/2014; KENYA-AID, n. 10306/CEFA/KEN, 18/05/2017.

Battle of Curiosity Assertion

The authors declare that the analysis was carried out within the absence of any business or monetary relationships that may very well be construed as a possible battle of curiosity.

Acknowledgments

We thank Valeria Ventorino, Francesco Vinale, Nadia Lombardi, and Matteo Lorito for editorial help and feedback.

Footnotes

References

Ahmad, I., Khan, M. S. A., Aqil, F., and Singh, M. (2011). “Microbial applications in agriculture and the environment: a broad perspective,” in Microbes and Microbial Know-how: Agricultural and Environmental Functions, eds I. Ahmad, F. Ahmad, and J. Pichtel (New York, NY: Springer), 1–27. Google Scholar

Altomare, C., Norvell, W. A., Bjorkman, T., and Harman, G. E. (1999). Solubilization of phosphates and micronutrients by the plant-growth-promoting and biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum Rifai 1295-22. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 2926–2933. PubMed Summary | Google Scholar

Ashraf, M., Hasnain, S., Berge, O., and Mahmood, T. (2004). Inoculating wheat seedlings with exopolysaccharide-producing micro organism restricts sodium uptake and stimulates plant progress underneath salt stress. Biol. Fertil. Soils 40, 157–162. doi: 10.1007/s00374-004-0766-y CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Barra, P. J., Inostroza, N. G., Acuña, J. J., Mora, M. L., Crowley, D. E., and Jorquera, M. A. (2016). Formulation of bacterial consortia from avocado (Persea americana Mill.) and their impact on progress, biomass and superoxide dismutase exercise of wheat seedlings underneath salt stress. Appl. Soil Ecol. 102, 80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.02.014 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Bell, C. W., Asao, S., Calderon, F., Wolk, B., and Wallenstein, M. D. (2015). Plant nitrogen uptake drives rhizosphere bacterial group meeting throughout plant progress. Soil Biol. Biochem. 85, 170–182. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.03.006 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Bonanomi, G., Ippolito, F., Cesarano, G., Vinale, F., Lombardi, N., Crasto, A., et al. (2017). Biochar chemistry outlined by13C-CPMAS NMR explains reverse results on soilborne microbes and crop crops. Appl. Soil Ecol. 124, 351–361. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.11.027 CrossRef Full Textual content

Brotman, Y., Landau, U., Cuadros-Inostroza, Á., Tohge, T., Fernie, A. R., Chet, I., et al. (2013). Trichoderma-plant root colonization: escaping early plant protection responses and activation of the antioxidant equipment for saline stress tolerance. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003221. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003221 PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Contreras-Cornejo, H. A., López-Bucio, J. S., Méndez-Bravo, A., Macías-Rodríguez, L., Ramos-Vega, M., Guevara-García, Á. A., et al. (2015). Mitogen-activated protein kinase 6 and ethylene and auxin signaling pathways are concerned in Arabidopsis root-system structure alterations by Trichoderma atroviride. Mol. Plant-Microbe Work together. 28, 701–710. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-01-15-0005-R PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

de Vries, F. T., and Wallenstein, M. D. (2017). Under-ground connections underlying above-ground meals manufacturing: a framework for optimising ecological connections within the rhizosphere. J. Ecol. 105, 913–920. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12783 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Di Stasio, E., Maggio, A., Ventorino, V., Pepe, O., Raimondi, G., and De Pascale, S. (2017). Free-living (N 2 )-fixing micro organism as potential enhancers of tomato progress underneath salt stress. Acta Hortic. 1164, 151–156. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1164.19 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

EIBC (European Biostimulants Business Council) (2013). Selling the Biostimulant Business and the Function of Plant Biostimulants in Making Agriculture Extra Sustainable. Accessible on-line at: www.biostimulants.eu/

Fiorentino, N., Ventorino, V., Woo, S. L., Pepe, O., De Rosa, A., Gioia, L., et al. (2018). Trichoderma-based biostimulants modulate rhizosphere microbial populations and enhance N uptake effectivity, yield, and dietary high quality of leafy greens. Entrance. Plant Sci. 9:743. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00743 PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Fontenelle, A. D. B., Guzzo, S. D., Lucon, C. M. M., and Harakava, R. (2011). Progress promotion and induction of resistance in tomato plant in opposition to Xanthomonas euvesicatoria and Alternaria solani by Trichoderma spp. Crop Prot. 30, 1492–1500. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.07.019 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., Berg, G., Pirttil,ä, A. M., Compant, S., Campisano, A., et al. (2015). The hidden world inside crops: ecological and evolutionary issues for outlining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 79, 293–320. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00050-14 PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Hariprasad, P., and Niranjana, S. R. (2009). Isolation and characterization of phosphate solubilizing rhizobacteria to enhance plant well being of tomato. Plant Soil 316, 13–24. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9754-6 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Hossain, M. M., Sultana, F., and Islam, S. (2017). “Plant Growth-Promoting Fungi (PGPF): Phytostimulation and induced systemic resistance,” in Plant-Microbe Interactions in Agro-Ecological Views, Quantity 2: Microbial Interactions and Agro-Ecological Impacts, eds D. Singh, H. Singh, and R. Prabha (Singapore: Springer), 135–191. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-6593-4 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Inamdar, S., Kanitkar, R. U., and Watve, M. G. (2000). Longevity of Azotobacter cysts and a mannequin for optimization of cyst density in liquid bioinoculants. Curr. Sci. 78, 719–721. Google Scholar

Leff, J. W., Lynch, R. C., Kane, N. C., and Fierer, N. (2016). Plant domestication and the meeting of bacterial and fungal communities related to strains of the frequent sunflower, Helianthus annuus. New Phytol. 214, 412–423. doi: 10.1111/nph.14323 PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Lorito, M., and Woo, S. L. (2015). “Trichoderma: a multi-purpose tool for integrated pest management,” in Rules of Plant-Microbe Interactions, ed B. Lugtenberg (Cham: Springer Worldwide Publishing), 345–353. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-08575-3_36 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Lugtenberg, B. (2015). Rules of Plant-Microbe Interactions: Microbes for Sustainable Agriculture. Cham: Springer Worldwide Publishing, p. 448. Google Scholar

Manganiello, G., Sacco, A., Ercolano, M. R., Vinale, F., Lanzuise, S., Pascale, A., et al. (2018). Modulation of tomato response to Rhizoctonia solani by Trichoderma harzianum and its secondary metabolite harzianic acid. Entrance. Microbiol. 9:1966. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01966 PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Martínez-Medina, A., Van Wees, S., and Pieterse, C. M. (2017). Airborne alerts by Trichoderma fungi stimulate iron uptake responses in roots leading to priming of jasmonic acid-dependent defences in shoots of Arabidopsis thaliana and Solanum lycopersicum. Plant Cell Environ. 40, 2691–2705. doi: 10.1111/pce.13016 PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Mastouri, F., Björkman, T., and Harman, G. E. (2012). Trichoderma harzianum enhances antioxidant protection of tomato seedlings and resistance to water defecit. Mol. Plant-Microbe Work together. 9, 1264–1271. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-09-11-0240 CrossRef Full Textual content

Mendoza-Mendoza, A., Zaid, R., Lawry, R., Hermosa, R., Monte, E., Horwitz, B. A., et al. (2018). Molecular dialogues between Trichoderma and roots: position of the fungal secretome. Fungal Biol. Rev. 32, 62–85. doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2017.12.001 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Raaijmakers, J. M., Paulitz, T. C., Steinberg, C., Alabouvette, C., and Moënne-Loccoz, Y. (2009). The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and useful microorganisms. Plant Soil 321, 341–361. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9568-6 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Rizvi, A., and Khan, M. S. (2018). Heavy metallic induced oxidative injury and root morphology alterations of maize (Zea mays L.) crops and stress mitigation by metallic tolerant nitrogen fixing Azotobacter chroococcum. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 157, 9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.063 PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Rojas-Tapias, D., Moreno-Galván, A., Pardo-Díaz, S., Obando, M., Rivera, D., and Bonilla, R. (2012). Impact of inoculation with plant growth-promoting micro organism (PGPB) on amelioration of saline stress in maize (Zea mays). Appl. Soil Ecol. 61, 264–272. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.01.006 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Rouphael, Y. P., Franken, C., Schneider, D., Schwarz, M., Giovannetti, M., Agnolucci, S., et al. (2015). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi act as biostimulants in horticultural crops. Sci. Hortic. 196, 91–108. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.002 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Rubio, B. M., Quijada, N. M., Pérez, E., Domínguez, S., Monte, E., and Hermosa, R. (2014). Figuring out useful qualities of Trichoderma parareesei for crops. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 6, 1864–1873. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03375-13 CrossRef Full Textual content

Samolski, I., Rincón, A. M., Pinzón, L. M., Viterbo, A., and Monte, E. (2012). The qid74 gene from Trichoderma harzianum has a job in root structure and plant biofertilization. Microbiology 158, 129–138. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.053140-0 PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Sivasithamparam, Okay., and Ghisalberti, E. L. (1998). “Secondary metabolism in Trichoderma and Gliocladium,” in Trichoderma and Gliocladium. Quantity 1: Primary Biology, Taxonomy and Genetics, eds G. E. Harman and C. P. Kubicek (London: Taylor and Francis Ltd.), 139–191.

Sofo, A., Nuzzaci, M., Vitti, A., Tataranni, G., and Scopa, A. (2014). “Control of biotic and abiotic stresses in cultivated plants by the use of biostimulant microorganisms,” in Enchancment of Crops within the Period of Climatic Modifications, eds P. Ahmad, M. Wani, M. Azooz, and L. S. Tran (New York, NY: Springer), 107–117. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8830-9_5 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Soni, R., Kumar, V., Suyal, D. C., Jain, L., and Goel, R. (2017). “Metagenomics of plant rhizosphere microbiome,” in Understanding Host-Microbiome Interactions – An Omics Strategy, eds R. Singh, R. Kothari, P. Koringa, and S. Singh (Singapore: Springer), 193–205. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-5050-3_12. CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Spaepen, S. (2015). “Plant hormones produced by microbes,” in Rules of Plant-Microbe Interactions, ed B. Lugtenberg (Cham: Springer Worldwide Publishing), 247–256. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-08575-3_26 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Studholme, D. J., Harris, B., Le Cocq, Okay., Winsbury, R., Perera, V., Ryder, L., et al. (2013). Investigating the useful traits of Trichoderma hamatum GD12 for sustainable agriculture – insights from genomics. Entrance. Plant Sci. 4:258. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00258 PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Van Oosten, M. J., Di Stasio, E., Cirillo, V., Silletti, S., Ventorino, V., Pepe, O., et al. (2018). Root inoculation with Azotobacter chroococcum 76A enhances tomato crops adaptation to salt stress underneath low N situations. BMC Plant Biol. 18:205. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1411-5 PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Van Oosten, M. J., Pepe, O., De Pascale, S., Silletti, S., and Maggio, A. (2017). The position of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop crops. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 4:5. doi: 10.1186/s40538-017-0089-5 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Ventorino, V., Pascale, A., Adamo, P., Rocco, C., Fiorentino, N., Mori, M., et al. (2018). Comparative evaluation of autochthonous bacterial and fungal communities and microbial biomarkers of polluted agricultural soils of the Terra dei Fuochi. Sci. Rep. 8:14281. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32688-5 PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Ventorino, V., Sannino, S., Piccolo, A., Cafaro, V., Carotenuto, R., and Pepe, O. (2014). Methylobacterium populi VP2: plant growth-promoting bacterium remoted from a extremely polluted atmosphere for polycyclic fragrant hydrocarbon (PAH) biodegradation. Sci. World J. 2014, 1–11. doi: 10.1155/2014/931793 PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Vinale, F., Sivasithamparam, Okay., Ghisalberti, E. L., Marra, R., Barbetti, M. J., Li, H., et al. (2008). A novel position for Trichoderma secondary metabolites within the interactions with crops. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 72, 80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2008.05.005 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Viscardi, S., Ventorino, V., Duran, P., Maggio, A., De Pascale, S., Mora, M. L., et al. (2016). Evaluation of plant progress selling actions and abiotic stress tolerance of Azotobacter chroococcum strains for a possible use in sustainable agriculture. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 16, 848–863. doi: 10.4067/S0718-95162016005000060 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Wallenstein, M. D. (2017). Managing and manipulating the rhizosphere microbiome for plant well being: a techniques strategy. Rhizosphere 3, 230–232. doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2017.04.004 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Wani, S. A., Chand, S., and Ali, T. (2013). Potential use of Azotobacter chroococcum in crop manufacturing: an outline. Curr. Agr. Res. J. 1, 35–38. doi: 10.12944/CARJ.1.1.04 CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar