why college can t be free.
The idea that college is free is a myth. It’s a lie. The idea of free college has been a part of the American psyche since the beginning of time. In fact, the idea was first put forth by the British economist John Maynard Keynes in his famous 1936 book, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Keynes was a brilliant economist, but he was also a man of his time, a philosopher, not a politician. He was not interested in the politics of today. His goal was to understand the economy and the world in which he lived. And he did that by looking at the past.
Keynes was an economist who was interested not in economics, or even in politics, as we know them today, he wanted to know what was going on in our world. So he looked at what happened in Europe during the Great Depression. What he found was that the people who were most affected by that depression were the middle class. They were people like the great industrialists, like Henry Ford, who had been in business for a long time and had a lot of money. But they were also the working class, people in factories and mines and factories. Those people were not the ones who got the most money, they got a little bit of it, because they had to work harder. That’s why they didn’t get as much as the rich people. Their wages were lower. When they went to college, their wages went up. This was the way it was in England and America. You could go to a college and get a degree, you could get an MBA, get into a big company, go on to get your doctorate, become a professor, be a lawyer, have a great career, buy a house, retire, live happily ever after. All of that was possible for the poor. If you were poor, it wasn’t possible. There was no way to go from being poor to being rich. We have to look at this from a different perspective. Our society is based on the concept of equality. People are born into this society, we are all equal, so we have the same rights and responsibilities. I think that’s the reason why we’re so proud of our country. Because we believe in equality, that we all have equal rights. Now, if you look around the country, there are a number of states that have laws that say that you can’t be discriminated
Can college ever be free?
The answer is yes.
, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, has proposed a new way to pay for college. He calls it “free tuition.”
…
What are the disadvantages of free college?
The biggest disadvantage is that it’s not free. It’s a tax. And it costs money.
, a free-market economist, has estimated that the cost of college would be $1.5 trillion over the next decade. That’s about $100,000 per student. The cost would rise to $2.2 trillion by 2026, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
Why Should colleges be free?
The answer is that they should be.
, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, has argued that the free market should determine the price of education. He argues that if colleges are free, they will be more efficient and will provide better education for students. This is because colleges will have to compete with each other for the students who want to attend them. The more students that attend a college, the more money they make. If colleges were free to charge what they wanted, then they would be able to offer more courses and offer better quality. In fact, this is exactly what the Free Market Institute has done. They have offered courses that are more expensive than they are needed to teach. For example, in the past, students were required to take courses in math and science. These courses were expensive because they were not needed. But now, with the rise of the Internet, these courses are no longer required. Students can take these classes online and pay for them with their own money. As a result, colleges have been able, through the use of technology, to increase their profits. And this has led to the creation of a new class of students, who are able and willing to pay more for higher education than before.
Why Free college is bad for taxpayers?
The answer is that it’s bad because it costs money.
, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, has calculated that the cost of a four-year public university education is $1,000 per student. That’s a lot of money, but it doesn’t include the costs of tuition, books, and other expenses. The cost is even higher for students who don’t graduate. In fact, the average cost for a public college education in the United States is more than $30,500 per year. And that’s before you factor in room and board, transportation, health care, etc. (See the chart below.)
…
“The cost to taxpayers of public higher education has been rising steadily for decades,” said David H. Friedman, professor of economics at Harvard University and author of “The Cost of College: How Much Does It Cost?”
Friedman’s calculations show that a typical four year public institution costs $2,400 per person, or $3,200 per family. But that doesn, of course, include all the other costs that go into the education of students. For example, it takes a student about three years to earn a bachelor’s degree, so the total cost per degree is about $10,800. A student who graduates with a master’s in business administration, for example—a degree that costs about twice as much as a college degree—will need to pay about a third of that cost. So the net cost, in dollars, is much higher than the $300 per-student figure. “It’s not just the money,” Friedman said. “[It] is the fact that students are paying for it.”
Free college has become a hot topic in recent years, with many politicians and pundits arguing that free college will make America great again. It’s true that many Americans are willing to spend more money on higher ed, especially if it means they can get a better education. However, Friedman’s research shows that this is not the case. He found that, on average, students pay more for their education than they do for the same amount of time. This is because students spend a greater percentage of their time studying than their parents did. As a result, they spend less time on their studies and more time working. According to Friedman: “In the long run, higher-education spending is a net negative for public spending.” Friedman also found, however